Bodes well for my future screenwriting career.

Authors: Drew Ochocinco (blogs in black) + Mark Sabb (blogs in blue) = Fresh.Innovative.Brownies
I had originally intended to write a post on Fabolous’ concert at Memorial Hall and how the DTH shat upon it unfairly and probably ruined the show through all the negative press they gave it, but then Lady Gaga came out with a new music video and blew my mind all over my face.
I’ve watched it like eight times now and I just don’t know. Is it genius? Is it completely pointless? Why does she shoot fire out of her chest at the end? IT JUST DOESN”T MAKE SENSE. According to Wikipedia, the video “takes place in a white bathhouse where Gaga is kidnapped by a group of supermodels who drug her and then sell her off to the Russian mafia for sex slavery.” I must admit that that particular reading of the video was lost upon me; I must have gotten distracted by all the jump-cuts and googly eyes. Really, the only conclusion I could possibly draw from viewing the video the first time through was, “This is crazier than a pile of moose shit on coke.”
Watching this video got me to thinking about what I’m going to term the “cult of Gaga,” the idea that not only do people actively enjoy Lady Gaga’s music, but take their fandom further than it’s logically “okay” to do. For example, I have a group of friends who dressed up as Lady Gaga for Halloween, each picking a different Gaga outfit from her various music videos. That's a bit much, in my opinion. But it prompted a hella ton of thought that I can compress into two basic questions.
The aforementioned questions are as follows:
1) Why do people like Lady Gaga so much?
2) What, at the end of the day, is Lady Gaga’s point?
To tackle these brain-busters, let’s think about what Lady Gaga does poorly and what she does well. Gaga is, I will admit, a particularly gifted individual; however, her talents do not lie in the conventional arenas for pop star aptitude. The backing tracks for her songs are unimaginative amalgamations of the electro-pop piffle that dominates pop radio these days, she often sings with the assistance of Autotune to augment her inadequate vocal abilities, her dancing is generally limited to her writhing around while her backup dancers do the real (pardon the pun) legwork, and in the opinion of this blogger her songwriting is not particularly notable*.
The thing is that Lady Gaga realizes all of that is bullshit that doesn’t really matter these days. She understands that in this day and age, the quality of an album or song has little to do with whether it performs well or not. Instead, her skills lie in mythmaking – the ability to convince people that Lady Gaga is worth thinking and talking about.
The persona of Lady Gaga cannot possibly be real, and yet we are supposed to believe that it is. She seems primarily concerned with taking whichever course of action that will elicit the strongest reaction from the public, especially if that reaction is, “What the hell?” To further this aim, Lady Gaga does not break character. Ever.
Plenty of pop stars create personas for themselves that allow them to act in a manner that’s not particularly consistent with their public image – David Bowie’s Ziggy Stardust, Beyonce’s Sasha Fierce, and Garth Brooks’ Chris Gaines immediately jump to mind – but each of these personas are grounded by the assurance that this is not the performer’s true self and instead a character. It seems that Lady Gaga is going for basically the same thing here, except Gaga takes this idea of the performer inhabiting the character and eliminates the base persona. She inhabits the construct of “Lady Gaga” pretty much all the time.
We never hear any news about Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta, the name that appears on Gaga’s birth certificate – she gives interviews only as Lady Gaga (for example, once she claimed to an interviewer that bulimia is only a positive thing), and is never photographed by paparazzi in clothing that would be considered “normal,” because Lady Gaga does not wear normal clothes. Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta wears normal clothes. But Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta does not go out in public, unlike, say, Britney Spears, who has absolutely zero qualms about being photographed at Rite-Aid while wearing jeans and a t-shirt, and then going onstage at a concert wearing an outfit that looks like it was designed by a perverted schizophrenic. There is an understood separation between “Britney Spears” the performer and Britney Spears the human being. With Lady Gaga, this is not the case. Lady Gaga is Lady Gaga all the time, because she is Lady Gaga.
If my logic seems circular, that’s because it is – a large portion of the Lady Gaga persona is rooted in her bizarre actions that seem arbitrary and pointless. Often these decisions are rooted in fashion, like the time she wore an outfit made completely out of Kermit the Frog heads. From a marketing standpoint, it’s a brilliant move. Because of Gaga’s pervasive media presence and public image, it’s extremely possible for a person to have a fully-formed opinion on Lady Gaga before they’ve heard one of her songs. People are more apt to purchase music from an artist in whom to they have become emotionally invested to the point that they have formulated an opinion about that artist, even if that opinion is negative. That’s just the way human beings work, and this is how Lady Gaga has sold four million albums throughout the world.
It is reductive, however, to assume that Lady Gaga is acting all crazy in just so she can sell records; I would say that Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta lives her life as a piece of performance art designed to “push boundaries” and “shift paradigms.” Certainly, she actively wrestles with sexual mores – she has spoken frankly and openly about her bisexuality, and her songs and music videos often deal with sex, though generally in the “sex as power brokering” sense with less of an emphasis upon the “sex as activity” sense.
At this point, I should probably talk about the whole Lady Gaga bisexual thing. By speaking on her bisexuality, she points to a continuum of sexuality when usually in the arena of pop music we’re dealing with a fairly firm split between gay and straight, which is pretty cool and definitely helps start a conversation about sexuality that needs to happen more often in pop. Additionally, there are debates floating around various corners of the internet (read: celebrity gossip blogs, various YouTube videos) over whether or not Lady Gaga is an intersexual.
Ultimately, whether or not our good friend Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta has both girl parts and boy parts is irrelevant. Her bisexuality and rumors about her gender do enough to position her as an ambassador for the LBTGQ community. Indeed, when she was awarded some random trophy at one of those MTV awards shows that tend to pop up every couple months, she gleefully exclaimed, “This is for God and the gays!” Yelling something like that tends to imply that you represent a group pretty hard.
Anyhoo, Lady Gaga understands that in the arena of pop music, women are often objectified by male performers. She essentially fights fire with fire by turning misogyny on its head and treating men as sexual objects in songs such as “Poker Face” and “Bad Romance.” “Poker Face” can be read as Gaga’s assertion of sexual dominance over a partner**, rendering him putty in her hands because of how awesomely hot and manipulative she is (or something).
Note her use of the word “bitch” self-referentially in the song “Bad Romance.” She refers to herself as a “free bitch” and essentially commands whomever the song is directed at to have sex with her, but she “don’t wanna be friends (Oh)” and will be having nothing to do with the subject of the song beyond the sexual relationship. In this song, the “bitch” has power. The “bitch” is in control. The “bitch” has confident agency over her own sexuality. In the world of Gaga, bitch is what we aim for.
I’m hitting about sixteen hundred words total here, so I think it’s about time wrap this puppy up by talking about her actual music. Now I understand that “taste” is subjective and probably bullshit at the end of the day, so I won’t hate on her music too much and instead put it this way: every one of Gaga’s songs are really big-sounding, dump pop songs that bring little very little that is sonically new to the table. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing I leave to you. The point is that it often seems like more thought is being put into the marketing the brand of “Lady Gaga,” between her fashions, music videos, public image, etc. than the actual “music” of Lady Gaga. Which is more important? Does it matter? And if you buy into her image and then convince yourself that you like the music because of the image, then is there even a difference?
*I stand by all the criticism I have levied against her with the exception of “Poker Face.” That shit is fucking unimpeachable and is the aural equivalent of a carnival freakshow, and works precisely because it cultivates a sound as crazy as how Lady Gaga acts.
**Often it’s suggested (and I’m pretty sure this is perpetuated by Lady Gaga herself) that “Poker Face” is really about how L.G. is having sex with some guy while fantasizing about having sex with a girl, but there’s absolutely no way that you could ever draw this conclusion from the lyrics without having been told that this is what the song’s about. In my opinion, this fact renders this particular interpretation moot because you won’t find it unless you know to look for it, and even if you know to look for it, the evidence is pretty weak.
When people talk about the Ol’ Dirty Bastard* they usually use terms like “crazy,” “gangsta rapper,” or “Oh my God what the fuck was up with that guy.” However, by saying stuff like this we reduce a fascinating human being to just a few easily dismissed elements - the Ol' Dirty totality was much more than the Ol' Dirty sum of its parts.
Early in his career, ODB functioned as the comic relief of the Wu-Tang Clan, the seminal rap group of which he was a member, and a group so great that if you haven't heard of them you should probably have your citizenship revoked. The Wu was talking about some pretty heavy stuff, so they needed a guy like Dirt McGurt to come in there and lighten things up from time to time. His persona was that of the rampaging id, a guy who had given himself over totally to his basest desires, rapping mainly about sex, drugs and bodily functions. ODB's raps were pretty much totally informed by something called the pleasure principle, which is, um, a principle that drives us to seek pleasure. I don’t have exact figures but I’m pretty sure that roughly eighty-four percent of Dirty’s subject matter had to do with girls, rambling nonsense, poop, or very often some combination of those elements. These topics are often the symbols through which the id manifests itself.
The id is in constant conflict with the superego (which tries to control the id), while the ego is tasked with balancing the id and superego. Check out 2:39 in the video for "Brooklyn Zoo," in which ODB is with his crew. At first, it looks like his buddies are backing him up in case the shit goes down, but it becomes clear that they have to restrain Dirt Dawg because he's not going to be able to contain himself.
The id is often unconscious and acts automatically; it supplies humanity’s impulses and urges, and drives us to create. Check out this video of Dirty kicking a freestyle off the top of his head while zonked out of his mind.
Did you see that! That right there is the very definition of tapping into the id in order to create art. The thing that's absolutely astounding is that ODB recorded like this pretty much all the time during his earlier years. He'd just get wasted, go into the studio, and then ride the beat to greatness.
Sometime in between the release of his debut album Return to the 36 Chambers (The Dirty Version) and his sophomore long-player N---ga Please, it seems that Ason Unique launched a full-on war against rational thought. Choice lines from the album include, "I'll kill all my enemies at birth!" and "You can't use the word 'napkin!'" Behaviorally, he was no less off his rocker. He tried to collect a welfare check while he had the number-one album in the country, interrupted the Grammy's to point out that the Wu-Tang should have beaten Puff Daddy for Best Hip-Hop Album**, and had a guy in his crew with the unfortunate name of Shorty Shitstain. Clearly ODB was out of his goddamned mind.
But what if by outing himself as a crazy person, Big Baby Jesus was actually allowing himself to break free of the structures of society? Consider the video for his and Busta Rhymes' track "Woo-Ha! (Got You All in Check!)"
Busta Bus and Dirt are rapping from inside a padded room, implying that they've been institutionalized and therefore removed from society, rendered as "other." However, it is often from the position of "other" that one has the most power, because society's constraints no longer apply to someone outside that society's structure, freeing them up to innovate now that they're no longer contained within pre-existing boundaries. Dirty's position as other gives him the mobility to break through the structure and turn N---ga Please into a genuinely powerful and challenging work of art, and it's clear that he understands this, even going so far as to state he's "not caught up in your law" on the album's title track.
I'm not going to lie - N---a Please is an extremely difficult album to get through. It takes a while in each song for Ason to actually start rapping, and he actually doesn't appear on one track ("Gettin' High," the track that the aforementioned Shorty Shitstain shows up on) and is almost completely absent from a couple of others. Many of the songs ("I Want P---y" being the main one that comes to mind) are still dealing with satisfying the urges of the id, but the album as a whole completely fucks with the binaries that we think about within the context "black" music and "white" music, destroying the myth that a hip-hop album must have rapping on all the tracks. An easy listening song like "Good Morning Heartache" has no place on a hip-hop record - Dirty's warbling croon sounds like a strung-out Frank Sinatra - and on "I Can't Wait" he's screaming like a hardcore punk singer. Tracks like this would not normally be included on a hip-hop album, but Big Baby Jesus had the license to do whatever he damn well wanted, because he was no longer constrained by the structures of society.
In addition to breaking musical boundaries, this was the period in which Ol' Dirty Bastard was dropping some serious knowledge. On "All in Together Now" he calls himself "A dalmatian. . . I'm white and I'm black. You can't understand it, then fuck you!" Statements like this completely denies that a binary exists between black and white, acknowledging that race is just a societal construct and that we're all amalgamations of various racial influences. Now, the argument can (and probably should) be made that ODB didn't take any of that stuff into consideration when he ad-libbed those lines, but that doesn't matter. Intent is unimportant when considering stuff like this; all that matters is the meanings that can be taken once the song is released.
Besides making vague comments on the nature of race, ODB was also making concrete political statements during this period. In "Ghetto Superstar," his collaboration with Pras of the Fugees and Mya, the basic thesis statement of Dirty's contribution to the song is this:
"The government and upper classes have no idea what's going on at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. My unique position as a gangsta rapper who has been othered by society allows me to both see these problems and comment on them."
I consider this period in Dirty's life his artistic zenith, because a couple years after the release of N---a Please, ODB would be caught up in a tragicomic run of legal troubles, losing himself almost completely to drugs and alcohol. His seemingly magical ability to tap into his id for on-the-spot lyrical inspiration would soon be lost, and he would be forced to depend on ghostwriters for the remainder of his career, before dying a tragic death in 2004. However, as the remaining members of the Wu constantly remind people, the Ol' Dirty Bastard would not have wanted the world to mourn his death, he would have wanted the world to celebrate his life. So when we think of ODB, let's think of his contributions to hip-hop and his evolution to the unique status as an "other," outside of the structures of society, mmkay?
*Also known as Osirus, Dirt McGurt, Dirt Dawg, Ason Unique, The Ol’ Specialist, Big Baby Jesus, Ol’ Dirty Chinese Restaurant, etc. You get the idea.
**Which is true, but that still doesn't make it okay to speak your mind on national television while somebody else is supposed to be receiving an award. As Kanye West recently learned.